Recall from Chapter 14 that a simple pole is a first-order pole. If F(s) has only simple poles, then D(s) becomes a product of factors, so that
then
D(s)
becomes a product of factors, so that
\n
F(s)=(s+p1β)(s+p2β)β―(s+pnβ)N(s)β
\n(15.48)
where s = βp1, βp2, β¦ , βpn are the simple poles, and pi β pj for all i β j (i.e., the poles are distinct). Assuming that the degree of N(s) is
Software packages such as MATLAB, Mathcad, and Maple are capable of finding partial fraction expansions quite easily.
Otherwise, we must first apply long division so that F(s) = N(s)βD(s) = Q(s) + R(s)βD(s), where the degree of R(s), the remainder of the long division, is less than the degree of D(s).
less than the degree of D(s), we use partial fraction expansion to decompose F(s) in Eq. (15.48) as
The expansion coefficients k1, k2, β¦ , kn are kno wn as the residues of F(s). There are man y ways of finding the expansion coefficients. One way is using the residue method. If we multiply both sides of Eq. (15.49) by (s + p1), we obtain
Because pi β pj, setting s = βp1 in Eq. (15.50) leaves only k1 on the righthand side of Eq. (15.50). Hence,
(s+p1β)F(s)βs=βp1ββ=k1β(15.51)
Thus, in general,
kiβ=(s+piβ)F(s)βs=βpiββ
(15.52)
This is known as Heavisideβs theorem. Once the values of ki are known, we proceed to find the inverse of F(s) using Eq. (15.49). Since the inverse transform of each term in Eq. (15.49) is β1 [kβ(s + a)] = keβat u(t), then, from Table 15.2,
where F1(s) is the remaining part of F(s) that does not ha ve a pole at s = βp. We determine the expansion coefficient kn as
knβ=(s+p)nF(s)βs=βpβ(15.55)
as we did above. To determine knβ1, we multiply each term in Eq. (15.54) by (s + p) n and differentiate to get rid of kn, then evaluate the result at s = βp to get rid of the other coefficients except knβ1. Thus, we obtain
knβ1β=dsdβ[(s+p)nF(s)]βs=βpβ
(15.56)
Repeating this gives
knβ2β=2!1βds2d2β[(s+p)nF(s)]βs=βpβ
(15.57)
Historical note: Named after Oliver Heaviside (1850β1925), an English engineer, the pioneer of operational calculus.
The mth term becomes
knβmβ=m!1βdsmdmβ[(s+p)nF(s)]βs=βpβ
(15.58)
where m = 1, 2, β¦ , n β 1. One can expect the differentiation to be difficult to handle as m increases. Once we obtain the values of k1, k2, β¦ , kn by partial fraction expansion, we apply the inverse transform
Lβ1[(s+a)n1β]=(nβ1)!tnβ1eβatβu(t)
\n(15.59)
to each term on the right-hand side of Eq. (15.54) and obtain
A pair of comple x poles is simple if it is not repeated; it is a double or multiple pole if repeated. Simple comple x poles may be handled the same way as simple real poles, but because complex algebra is involved the result is always cumbersome. An easier approach is a method known as completing the square. The idea is to express each complex pole pair (or quadratic term) in D(s) as a complete square such as (s + Ξ±) 2 + Ξ²2 and then use Table 15.2 to find the inverse of the term.
Because N(s) and D(s) always have real coefficients and we know that the complex roots of polynomials with real coef ficients must occur in conjugate pairs, F(s) may have the general form
F(s)=s2+as+bA1βs+A2ββ+F1β(s)
\n(15.61)
where F1(s) is the remaining part of F(s) that does not ha ve this pair of complex poles. If we complete the square by letting
The sine and cosine terms can be combined using Eq. (9.11).
Whether the pole is simple, repeated, or comple x, a general approach that can al ways be used in finding the expansion coefficients is the method of algebra, illustrated in Examples 15.9 to 15.11. To apply the method, we first set F(s) = N(s)βD(s) equal to an expansion containing unknown constants. We multiply the result through by a common denominator. Then we determine the unkno wn constants by equating coefficients (i.e., by algebraically solving a set of simultaneous equations for these coefficients at like powers of s).
Another general approach is to substitute specific, convenient values of s to obtain as man y simultaneous equations as the number of unknown coefficients, and then solve for the unkno wn coefficients. We must make sure that each selected v alue of s is not one of the poles of F(s). Example 15.11 illustrates this idea.
Find the inverse Laplace transform of Example 15.8
where Table 15.2 has been consulted for the inverse of each term.
F(s)=5+s+46ββs2+257sβ
Answer: 5Ξ΄(t) + (6eβ4*t* β 7 cos(5t))u(t).
F(s)=s(s+2)(s+3)s2+12β
Solution:
Unlike in the pre vious example where the partial fractions ha ve been provided, we first need to determine the partial fractions. Given that there are three poles, we let
les, we let
\n
s(s+2)(s+3)s2+12β=sAβ+s+2Bβ+s+3Cβ
\n(15.9.1)
where A, B, and C are the constants to be determined. We can find the constants using two approaches.
Determine the inverse Laplace transform of Practice Problem 15.8
Although B and C can be obtained using the method of residue, we will not do so, to a void comple x algebra. Rather , we can substitute two specific values of s [say s = 0, 1, which are not poles of F(s)] into Eq. (15.11.1). This will give us two simultaneous equations from which to find B and C. If we let s = 0 in Eq. (15.11.1), we obtain
7520β=3Aβ+25Cβ
or
20=25A+3C(15.11.2)
Because A = 2, Eq. (15.11.2) gi ves C = β10. Substituting s = 1 into Eq. (15.11.1) gives
(4)(34)20β=4Aβ+34B+Cβ
or
20=34A+4B+4C(15.11.3)
But A = 2, C = β10, so that Eq. (15.11.3) gives B = β2.
β METHOD 2 Algebraic method: Multiplying both sides of Eq. (15.11.1) by (s + 3)(s 2 + 8s + 25) yields